Monday, August 30, 2010

Is America exceptional? If so, how so? If no, why not? (Try to reference Winthrop and/or Crèvecoeur in your response, please).

When I think about this question, I have a double reaction to it. On one hand, I agree with Crèvecoeur and Winthrop in that as a young, brand new (to the Europeans, at least) continent, America held and still holds a lot of potential and opportunity. Like Crèvecoeur, I appreciate the Puritan work ethic, the opportunities that lay in America, and the melting pot of cultures that became America. On the other hand, I cannot go as far as Winthrop and Crèvecoeur in their praise of America. They both portray America as the golden society, or the chosen land. Like I said, I think America has a lot going for it, but there is also great value in the long, rich histories of older countries. To ignore these values because of a belief that America is perfect is, I think, a serious issue. There is so much to learn from European history, and I think that America could learn from the old world’s “experience,” so to speak. Also, if a group of people does not believe they can have flaws, then they have no potential for improvement. That belief in perfection is, as I see it, a flaw in itself.

1 comment:

  1. Emily, I would agree with you that America holds a lot of potential and the Europeans would think that this society could be perfect because they have the opportunity to pick and choose the best parts from all the existing societies. This method would allow the Europeans to create an “exceptional” society because it would not have to make it’s one mistakes, and it’s identity is much more diverse then that of the national identities of the European countries. I would disagree with the statement “That belief in perfection is, as I see it, a flaw in itself” I reject this on the grounds that one does not believe him or herself to be eternally perfect. One must maintain that perfection and the definition of perfection is constantly changing.

    ReplyDelete